tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3263297718339142335.post1924035059747921969..comments2011-09-11T19:35:46.731-04:00Comments on Shadow Gestalt: How am I supposed to wear this?Andrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18083134041549608361noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3263297718339142335.post-43842076371613636692010-01-17T23:36:24.225-05:002010-01-17T23:36:24.225-05:00As a loyal beater-wearer I must side with the Stor...As a loyal beater-wearer I must side with the Storm on this one.<br /><br />But of course the fricking logo is madness. Don't know what's up with that one.Justinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06737136868221022969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3263297718339142335.post-69464909663310102752010-01-17T04:29:01.704-05:002010-01-17T04:29:01.704-05:00I was really really hoping that this would piss yo...I was really really hoping that this would piss you off enough to comment. I'm glad it did. Mwahaha.<br /><br />But it still doesn't make sense to put the logo on, then, if it's never meant to be seen. Wouldn't it cost less <i>not</i> to embroider it in the first place?<br /><br />And I thought a-shirts and beaters were different, based on the cut, on how droopy they are away from the neck/chest area... n'est-ce pas?Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18083134041549608361noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3263297718339142335.post-76803907270566734022010-01-17T01:18:01.768-05:002010-01-17T01:18:01.768-05:00I kick myself for responding to this, but:
First,...I kick myself for responding to this, but:<br /><br />First, I say "you have to appreciate the appeal of feeling CINCHED STARCHED BELTED to understand fashion"...see: It doesn't HAVE to sound so sexual.<br /><br />Second, I agree that the A-SHIRT [preferred terminology] doesn't protect your shirt from your sweaty arpmits (which is a down side), but if one were wearing a proper summer suit [with a very light-weight, see-through dress shirt, a vest, slacks, and a jacket that you want to take off] the A-SHIRT would have the advantage of not being visible THROUGH any of the clothing. You know that look, where you can see the arms of the T-underSHIRT through the dress shirt. Yucky. an ASHIRT is so long so it doesn't come untucked [which would make the hem visible through your dress shirt] and the polo logo is so low so that it will stay tucked in [and won't become visible through your dress shirt]. All is explained.<br /><br />That being said, wearing an A-SHIRT that was designed to go under your clothes as a shirt by itself is icky. Also: Men should have to shave their armpits if they want to bare them in public.S.H.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11888096716541403668noreply@blogger.com